FACT CHECK #5

FOUND ON JOHN MACHAFFIE’S BLOG:

Thursday, June 6, 2013
RIGHT NOW SIGNING FOR THE ‘RV’ AND THE ‘RD’
Subject: == NOTICE TO PROCEED ==
To: internationalconnections@wellsfargo.com

Hello Every One and Good Day, trust all is well,

Thank you for your due diligence.

NOTICE TO PROCEED
NOTICE TO ALL / OFFICES / LEVELS / OBSERVERS
NOTICE TO AGENTS / PRINCIPALS

I AM, hereby,

I AM
RIGHT NOW
SIGNING FOR THE ‘RV’ AND THE ‘RD’
AS ONE UNDERWRITING FOR THE HIGHEST GOOD OF ALL
=SIGNED, ED LANSING=
=ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LIMITLESS HEART ETERNAL=

=ABSOLUTE DATA RECONCILED=
Posted by John MacHaffie at 6:32 PM                                                FALSE

========================================================================

FACTS:

THERE HAS BEEN NO RV. THE DINAR IS STILL AVAILABLE FOR 1160 DINAR TO THE DOLLAR. 

4 thoughts on “FACT CHECK #5

  1. Gee….someone must be bored. This idiot post from an obviously brain dead OPPT minion really deserves no Fact Checking, does it? Kind of redundant to ‘fact check’ something which is so stupid to begin with.

    But since we’re on the subject, howz bout we examine this whole premise of the ‘Fact Checking’ being done here, and see if we can’t additionally get a Reality Check on this site?

    I have examined Fact Checks 1-5 for June and it seems that John MacHaffie’s NESARA blog seems to be #1 on your hit parade with no other competition in the running. Could you have chosen a better target perhaps? The guy is about 50% right on a good day, and lately his days haven’t even been all that good…so granted, he’s not the sharpest crayon in the carton. But you give him an overall score of zero, for all of June, thus far? Seems to be a fair amount of Confirmation Bias on your part. And your facts are that superior to his? Anyone with a few functioning synapses can attempt to make the sort of arguments that you make here, which in effect seem to go something like this example –
    JM: 60% of PP’s have been delivered.
    YOU: Have not!

    That’s not an argument! That’s just contradiction. It’s what 5 year-olds do and you’re not at all convincing. In one of your ‘Fact Checks’ you even solicit ‘proof’ for any PP recipient to provide evidence that they have received their letter, and you promise not to tell anyone their names. Do you even have any concept of what you are talking about? Are you aware of the fundamental principles of an NDA? Why would anyone risk something they have waited so many years for, just so you can satisfy your need for ‘proof’? Have you any idea how absurd that is?

    So, the essential ingredient of Fact Checking is to be in possession of actual facts so as to be able to confirm or refute that which is being said. It appears that you have no facts with which to counter or affirm John MacHaffie’s statements or anyone else’s, for that matter. You offer nothing but surface attempts at gain-saying a retarded man. Not even very sporting really….add to that the fact that you missed all your shots, and it’s kind of a waste of everyone’s time, isn’t it?

    Like

    • Hello,

      You seem to want to argue points that are not important. And, who said that we are here to argue?

      Be advised that your critique of our asking for proof of a delivery receipt was circularly argumentative. After all, how would JM know if such was truly in process without all those people violating their NDA’s to tell him? Further, nobody would need an NDA when receiving such if the WGS was released. After all, we would be in a new monetary structure, so the cat would be way out of the bag at that point.

      Also, know that we are paid in recipients of a large prosperity program, so we will know when those “NDA’s” are in our hands. (wink wink). JM is not even in a PP and would have to rely on all those poor people breaking their NDA’s to get his “intel”. Additionally, the “NDA” in our agreement only limits disclosure of the source of the funds, not forbidding revealing that such was received.

      We do not just say “did not”, just to say it. We CAN say it because we KNOW based on our being on the list for such payment.

      Lastly, JM will not be the only one we will fact check.

      Thank you for your message.

      Like

    • Hello,

      We do not act as a source of facts. We leave the fact reporting to qualified individuals, such as Attorney Al Hodges, The Trustees of the World Global Settlements (The White Hats) and so forth. We are also paid in recipients of a large Prosperity Program and know instantly when we see false reporting of “delivery”. We KNOW. We have also had personal contact with two trustees of the WGS and are well positioned to receive proper orientation to confirm anything that is reported. While we don’t know everything, our interest is to treat recipients, dinar holders and the like with respect by making sure they get accurate information, which they deserve, and not be put through a roller coaster machine of hope one day and despair the next.

      The best confirmation we can offer you is to simply check our posts against what the so-called “gurus” say. If they are right, we will agree with them. If they are wrong, we will correct their information. Then, wait a while and see who was right and who was not. We will NOT disagree just to disagree.

      It’s as simple as that.

      Thank you for your message.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s